Starbucks asks Labor Council to suspend mail-in ballot union elections, alleging misconduct in the voting process

Starbucks The Federal Labor Council is required to suspend all mail-in union elections nationwide, alleging misconduct in the voting process by board members and the union organizing its baristas.

The Seattle-based coffee giant wrote in a letter to the National Labor Relations Board President and General Counsel Monday that Labor Council officials behaved improperly during an election in the Kansas City area and likely acted similarly in another. Starbucks cited an NLRB professional who contacted the company as a whistleblower.

More than 220 Starbucks coffee shops in the United States have voted to form unions, according to an NLRB count as of Friday. An additional 34 elections have been ordered or are in progress, and seven more stores are waiting to schedule elections.

The Starbucks Workers Union and NLRB did not immediately respond to requests for comment from CNBC.

In addition to requesting a pause in all scheduled elections by mail, Starbucks is requesting that all future elections be held in person while the allegations can be investigated.

According to Starbucks, NLRB officials allegedly coordinated with union agents to arrange in-person voting at Labor Council offices during the postal ballot elections. The company also claims that UW agents obtained classified, real-time information about a specific vote count so the union could target employees who had not yet voted. The company said NLRB officials and Workers United subsequently coordinated to cover up the activity.

Starbucks letter details email correspondence that allegedly occurred between union representatives and labor council officials. The company said it was informed of the contents of the emails by the whistleblower.

Starbucks said similar behavior occurred in elections in Seattle and Buffalo, New York, as well.

“Until a thorough investigation is conducted, anyone can guess the number of elections in how many other regions have been similarly affected,” the company said in the letter.

Under interim CEO Howard Schultz, Starbucks has vehemently opposed the efforts of unions at its sites. So far, the number of union coffee shops is a small part of the company’s nearly 9,000 Starbucks-owned coffee shops, but the coffee chain is working to curb the union’s momentum.

For example, the company announced a new round of wage increases in May for temporary workers, but said the changes would not apply to union positions, saying they would have to go through the negotiation process. earlier this month, United workers asked the company formally to extend wage increases to those locations.

Starbucks also faces 284 charges of union unfair labor practices, according to the NLRB. Allegations of misconduct by the company include allegations that it illegally fired regulators, closed stores or harassed its employees to prevent baristas from forming unions. Starbucks has denied all allegations of syndicate breaches.

The company filed two of its own charges against union organizers in Phoenix and Denver with the Labor Council. The NLRB rejected Phoenix’s claim, saying there was insufficient evidence that pro-union workers harassed fellow employees and customers during a rally.