Hong Kong convicts 14 pro-democracy activists in national security case

HONG KONG (AP) — A Hong Kong court on Thursday convicted 14 pro-democracy activists in the city. The biggest national security issue Under a law imposed by Beijing that eliminated public opposition.

Among those found guilty of conspiracy to commit sabotage are former legislators Leong Kwok Hong, Lam Cheok Ting, Helena Wong and Raymond Chan, who could face life imprisonment when sentenced later. The two defendants who were acquitted were former district council members Li Yu-chun and Lawrence Lau.

They were among 47 democracy defenders who were tried in 2021 for their involvement in the operation Informal primary elections. Prosecutors accused them of trying to paralyze Hong Kong’s government and oust the city’s leader by securing the legislative majority needed to indiscriminately veto budgets.

In a summary of the ruling distributed to the media, the court said that election participants declared that they “either will or will use the power granted by (the Legislative Council) under the (Basic Law) to veto budgets.”

Under the Basic Law, the chief executive can dissolve the legislature if the budget is not passed, but the president will have to step down if the budget is vetoed again in the newly formed legislature.

In the full 319-page ruling, the court also said that if the plan to veto the bills were to dissolve the legislature, it would mean that “the implementation of any new government policies would be seriously hampered and essentially halted.”

“The power and authority of both the government and the chief executive will be substantially undermined,” the court said in the ruling. “In our view…this would create a constitutional crisis in Hong Kong.”

The judges concluded that “unlawful means” are not limited to criminal acts only, and that it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove that the accused knew that the means used were “unlawful.”

The court was adjourned until later Thursday, and Judge Andrew Chan did not provide further details about the court’s reasons.

Lau, who was acquitted, told reporters that he should not be the focus of attention at the moment because the other defendants in the case deserve the public’s attention and love.

He said that if there was any “star” in the case, the ruling should be the “star” because it determined the judges’ reasoning and views. “This is part of our rule of law,” he added.

The court acquitted Lau after finding that he did not mention vetoing the budget in his election campaign and the court was unable to conclude that he intended to undermine state power.

Lee, the other accused who was found innocent, thanked the public for their interest in the case over the past few years. He said he could not say more about the verdict because the prosecution may appeal against his acquittal.

He added: “I feel calm, as always.” In an earlier Facebook post, he said Thursday was a special graduation ceremony for him, even though graduation is usually about sharing happiness with families and friends.

“Perhaps this best reflects the shared helplessness of our generation,” he said in his letter on Wednesday.

Lee, like Lau, was acquitted after the court found no evidence that he mentioned using his veto at an election forum, nor did he personally express his position on using his veto to force the government to respond to protesters’ demands.

While Lee – then a member of the now-defunct Civic Party – espoused a similar political platform as other party members, the court took into account that he was late in the party’s campaign for the primaries and that he had little choice. Rather, adopting the platform that others use. Hence, the court said in the ruling that it could not be certain that he intended to undermine the authority of the state.

Observers said that the sabotage case illustrates how the security law is used Crushing political opposition after massive anti-government protests in 2019. But the Beijing and Hong Kong governments have insisted that the law has helped restore stability to the city and that the independence of the judiciary is being protected.

Activists tried in the main case included legal scholar Benny Tai, former student leader Joshua Wong, and dozens of former lawmakers including Leung Kwok Hung and Claudia Mo.

Thirty-one of them, including Tay, Wong and Mo, pleaded guilty to the charge against them Conspiracy to commit acts of sabotage. They have a better chance of shorter prison sentences and will be sentenced later.

Sixteen others, including Leung, pleaded not guilty and underwent a non-jury trial. After the verdicts are issued on Thursday, mitigation hearings will be scheduled to determine the sentences of those convicted.

On Thursday, before the court hearing, Chan Bo-ying, leader of the pro-democracy League of Social Democrats (LDS), was arrested, along with three other court members, according to a Facebook post by party member Viju Chan. Chan Bo Ying is also the wife of former MP Leong Kwok Hong, one of the defendants convicted on Thursday.

Local media reports, such as the South China Morning Post, said the detainees tried to raise a yellow banner in protest as they walked to the court grounds, but were stopped and escorted away by police.

Diplomats from the United States, Australia and Britain, along with dozens of residents, waited outside the court building, which was guarded by police, to secure seats to hear the rulings.

Former Democratic Party Chairman Emily Lau was among those who attended in support. She told reporters that she felt sad because so many had been detained for more than three years, but she refused to comment on the ruling.

Social worker Stanley Chang, a friend of one of the 16 defendants, said he arrived at the site at 4 a.m. because he feared he would not be able to get a seat. Zhang said there are very few things supporters can do for them, and attending the hearing is a kind of companionship.

“I want to offer some support to my friend and the faces I saw in the news reports,” he said.

But the government postponed the legislative elections that would have followed the primaries, citing public health risks during the coronavirus pandemic. the Electoral laws were later reformed. Significantly reducing the public’s ability to vote and increasing the number of pro-Beijing lawmakers in the Legislative Council.